Tornadoes · United States · Texas · 2015
EF0 tornado, Groom, Texas, November 16, 2015
This EF0 tornado ran 0.2 miles across Carson County on November 16, 2015, touching down at 6:09 PM CST and reaching 50 yards wide. It killed nobody.
The rating scale
Tracks are drawn in the color of the rating. The Enhanced Fujita scale rates the damage rather than measuring the wind: the speeds are what that damage is taken to imply.
EF065 to 85 mphthis tornado
Light damage. Surface peeled off some roofs, gutters and siding damaged, branches broken, shallow-rooted trees pushed over.
EF186 to 110 mph
Moderate damage. Roofs badly stripped, mobile homes overturned or badly damaged, exterior doors lost, windows broken.
EF2111 to 135 mph
Considerable damage. Roofs torn off well-built houses, frame homes shifted on their foundations, mobile homes destroyed, large trees snapped or uprooted, cars lifted off the ground.
EF3136 to 165 mph
Severe damage. Whole stories of well-built houses destroyed, large buildings badly damaged, trains overturned, trees debarked, heavy cars lifted and thrown.
EF4166 to 200 mph
Devastating damage. Well-built houses leveled, structures with weak foundations moved some distance, cars thrown and large missiles generated.
EF5over 200 mph
Incredible damage. Strong frame houses swept off their foundations, car-sized missiles thrown more than 100 meters, steel-reinforced concrete badly damaged, high-rise buildings deformed.
Unrated
The survey recorded a tornado but could not put a number on it, most often because it crossed open country and damaged nothing a rating can be read from.
The record
- Rating
- EF0
- Date
- November 16, 2015
- Touchdown
- 6:09 PM CST (00:09 UTC)
- Lifted
- 6:10 PM CST (00:10 UTC)
- On the ground
- 1 minutes
- Path length
- 0.2 miles (0.4 km)
- Path width
- 50 yards (46 m)
- Deaths
- 0
- Injuries
- 0
- County
- Carson County
- Touchdown point
- 35.207, -101.127
- Lift-off point
- 35.210, -101.126
- Record number
- 1511161809-01
The damage survey
10 damage points were recorded along this path by NWS AMA, in the Damage Assessment Toolkit the survey teams carry. The strongest indicator was rated EF2. The highest wind the damage implies is 118 mph.
- Flipped irrigation system.
- Poles broke but only one side of street. Likely small and weakened.
- Large truck moved 200 feet.
- Brief touchdown. No Visible damage.
Survey points are preliminary and are the raw material the published rating was built from. Source: NWS Damage Assessment Toolkit.
What the Weather Service recorded
A powerful storm system brought significant severe weather to the region. Tornadoes, damaging winds, and large hail accompanied thunderstorms that formed during the afternoon hours and persisted into the evening. This was a very unusual event for late fall in the Central High Plains. One significant factor in this anomalous event was the presence of an unusual amount of moisture for mid-November, contributing to relatively high values of instability. No tornadoes had previously been documented in the Texas Panhandle during the month of November.
Storm chasers reported a brief touchdown just west of Groom. No damage was visible. The tornado was rated EF-0.
From NOAA NCEI's Storm Events Database, the narrative the local forecast office wrote for Storm Data.
The warnings
3 minutes of warning. NWS AMA issued a tornado warning for this county at 00:06 UTC, 3 minutes before the tornado touched down, in force until 00:21 UTC.
The county was under a tornado watch, issued at 19:07 UTC and running to 02:42 UTC.
| Issued (UTC) | Expired | Product | Office |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19:07 UTC | 02:42 UTC | Tornado Watch | AMA |
| 23:02 UTC | 23:38 UTC | Severe Thunderstorm Warning | AMA |
| 23:58 UTC | 00:45 UTC | Severe Thunderstorm Warning | AMA |
| 00:06 UTC | 00:21 UTC | Tornado Warning | AMA |
| 00:46 UTC | 01:15 UTC | Tornado Warning | AMA |
| 01:16 UTC | 01:33 UTC | Tornado Warning | AMA |
| 01:24 UTC | 02:30 UTC | Severe Thunderstorm Warning | AMA |
| 01:37 UTC | 02:30 UTC | Severe Thunderstorm Warning | AMA |
| 01:57 UTC | 02:18 UTC | Tornado Warning | AMA |
| 02:28 UTC | 03:15 UTC | Severe Thunderstorm Warning | AMA |
| 02:42 UTC | 03:52 UTC | Tornado Watch | AMA |
| 02:57 UTC | 03:30 UTC | Severe Thunderstorm Warning | AMA |
| 12:00 UTC | 00:00 UTC | Wind Advisory | AMA |
Every warning and watch covering the touchdown point that day, from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of National Weather Service products. Lead time is measured from the issue of the warning in force to the touchdown time in the database, both of which were recorded to the minute by different people.
The forecast that day
The Storm Prediction Center had this point in a Enhanced Risk, with a 0.10 chance of a tornado within 25 miles. The outlook in force was issued at 20:16 UTC.
SPC's Day 1 convective outlook as it stood when the tornado began, read at the touchdown point. The same archive is on the radar archive.
The air that afternoon
The radiosonde launches on either side of the tornado, from the nearest station that was launching then, drawn and analyzed the way Storm Lab does: the same diagram, the same parcel and shear definitions SPC's mesoanalysis uses.
Amarillo Airport, TX (KAMA), 00:00Z
0.2 hours before the tornado, 52 km from the path. November 17, 2015.
- Mixed-layer CAPE
- 345 J/kg
- Mixed-layer CIN
- -63 J/kg
- Surface CAPE
- 955 J/kg
- Mixed-layer LCL
- 1692 m above ground
- 0-6 km bulk shear
- 74 kt
- 0-1 km bulk shear
- 30 kt
- 0-1 km storm-relative helicity
- 276 m²/s²
- 0-3 km storm-relative helicity
- 280 m²/s²
- Significant tornado parameter
- 0.2
- Supercell composite
- 3.3
- 0-3 km lapse rate
- 7.8 K/km
Amarillo Airport, TX (KAMA), 12:00Z
11.8 hours after it, 52 km from the path. November 17, 2015.
- Mixed-layer CAPE
- 0 J/kg
- Mixed-layer CIN
- -24147 J/kg
- Surface CAPE
- 0 J/kg
- Mixed-layer LCL
- 1551 m above ground
- 0-6 km bulk shear
- 63 kt
- 0-1 km bulk shear
- 19 kt
- 0-1 km storm-relative helicity
- -16 m²/s²
- 0-3 km storm-relative helicity
- -27 m²/s²
- Significant tornado parameter
- 0.0
- Supercell composite
- 0.0
- 0-3 km lapse rate
- 5.9 K/km
The surface observations
Pampa (PPA), 47 km from the path, in the two hours either side.
| Time (UTC) | Temp (°F) | Dew point (°F) | Wind | Gust (kt) | Pressure (mb) | Weather |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22:15 UTC | 72.5 | 56.3 | 170° 21 kt | 30 | 998 | |
| 22:35 UTC | 71.78 | 57.2 | 170° 20 kt | 28 | 998.3 | |
| 22:55 UTC | 70.34 | 56.66 | 170° 20 kt | 28 | 998.3 | |
| 23:15 UTC | 68.54 | 58 | 170° 18 kt | 25 | 997.6 | DZ |
| 23:35 UTC | 66.38 | 59.18 | 150° 26 kt | 31 | 997 | VCTS |
| 23:55 UTC | 66.74 | 55.76 | 180° 24 kt | 65 | 997.6 | -RA |
| 00:15 UTC | 65.3 | 60 | 170° 15 kt | 19 | 998 | RA |
| 00:35 UTC | 64.58 | 60.8 | 160° 16 kt | 28 | 997.3 | RA |
| 00:55 UTC | 62.42 | 58.46 | 180° 12 kt | 15 | 998 | -TSRA |
| 01:15 UTC | 61.88 | 58 | 170° 22 kt | 33 | 997 | -TSRA |
| 01:35 UTC | 61.7 | 59.54 | 170° 16 kt | 21 | 995.9 | TS |
| 01:55 UTC | 63 | 60.8 | 170° 25 kt | 31 | 994.6 |
From the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of airport observations.
The radar
The Amarillo radar (KAMA), 53 km away, was scanning. The volume nearest the touchdown began at 00:09 UTC.
Open the radar archive at this moment, over the track
Reflectivity and velocity, decoded from the Level II archive in the browser. Volumes take a few seconds to open the first time.
What was reported nearby
Local storm reports within 60 km of the path, in the three hours either side.
| Time (UTC) | Report | Where | County | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23:13 UTC | HAIL 1.75 | 4 Nne Wayside | Armstrong, TX | HAIL TO THE SIZE OF GOLF BALLS WAS REPORTED. |
| 23:45 UTC | TORNADO | 6 Wsw Goodnight | Armstrong, TX | BRIEF TORNADO JUST EAST OF TEXAS STATE HIGHWAY 207 AND JUST NORTH OF PALO DURO CANYON. |
| 23:45 UTC | TORNADO | 7 Ene Amarillo | Potter, TX | BRIEF TORNADO TOUCHDOWN IN AN OPEN FIELD. NO VISIBLE DAMAGE AND NO DAMAGE REPORTED. EF0. |
| 23:55 UTC | TSTM WND GST 75 | 5 Nnw Pampa | Gray, TX | |
| 00:10 UTC | TORNADO | 1 W Groom | Carson, TX | BRIEF TORNADO TOUCHDOWN IN AN OPEN FIELD. NO VISIBLE DAMAGE AND NO DAMAGE REPORTED. EF0. |
| 00:27 UTC | TORNADO | 11 S Pampa | Gray, TX | |
| 00:38 UTC | TORNADO | 4 Se Pampa | Gray, TX | MILE WIDE TORNADO REPORTED. |
| 00:45 UTC | TORNADO | 4 Se Pampa | Gray, TX | MILE WIDE TORNADO 4 MILES SOUTHEAST OF PAMPA WITH GAS LEAKS...DOWNED POWER LINES...AND MAJOR DAMAGE |
| 00:58 UTC | TORNADO | 8 S Pampa | Gray, TX | TORNADO ON THE GROUND REPORTED 8 MILES SOUTH OF PAMPA |
| 01:02 UTC | TORNADO | Codman | Roberts, TX | LARGE CONE TORNADO REPORTED 5 MILES EAST OF PERRYTON BY KVII STORM CHASERS. |
| 01:05 UTC | HAIL 1.75 | 1 S Pampa | Gray, TX | GOLF BALL SIZE HAIL AT THE BOWLING ALLEY IN SOUTH PAMPA. |
| 01:08 UTC | TORNADO | 2 Se Pampa | Gray, TX | TORNADO ON THE SOUTHEST LOOP IN PAMPA. |
| 01:09 UTC | TORNADO | 6 Se Kingsmill | Gray, TX | TORNADO REPORTED 6 MILES SOUTHEAST OF KINGSMILL. |
| 01:12 UTC | HAIL 1.75 | 3 E Pampa | Gray, TX | |
| 02:20 UTC | TSTM WND GST 65 | 6 Sse Borger | Carson, TX | |
| 02:20 UTC | HAIL 1 | 6 Sse Borger | Carson, TX |
From the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of National Weather Service local storm reports.
This ground now
The live radar over the trackEvery 2015 tornado in TexasEvery tornado in Texas since 1950Warnings in force in Texas nowThe forecast where you are
The other tornadoes of November 16, 2015
38 more were confirmed in the United States that day.
| Date | Time | Rating | Where | Path (mi) | Width (yd) | Deaths | Injuries | Damage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 16 | 3:54 PM CST | EF0 | Grant, KS | 0.1 | 25 | |||
| November 16 | 5:14 PM CST | EF0 | Finney, KS | 4.6 | 50 | |||
| November 16 | 5:20 PM CST | EF0 | Gove, KS | 2.7 | 25 | |||
| November 16 | 5:30 PM CST | EF0 | Gove, KS | 1.8 | 25 | |||
| November 16 | 5:34 PM CST | EF1 | Gove, KS | 18.5 | 300 | |||
| November 16 | 5:38 PM CST | EF3 | Seward, KS | 51.3 | 2,000 | |||
| November 16 | 5:44 PM CST | EF0 | Armstrong, TX | 0.4 | 50 | |||
| November 16 | 5:44 PM CST | EF0 | Roberts, TX | 0.1 | 50 | |||
| November 16 | 5:56 PM CST | EF2 | Lane, KS | 16.5 | 1,500 | |||
| November 16 | 6:05 PM CST | EF0 | Roberts, TX | 0.3 | 50 | |||
| November 16 | 6:19 PM CST | EF1 | Meade, KS | 6.3 | 100 | |||
| November 16 | 6:20 PM CST | EF3 | Gray, TX | 31.9 | 750 | |||
| November 16 | 6:27 PM CST | EF1 | Ness, KS | 3.9 | 200 | |||
| November 16 | 6:36 PM CST | EF1 | Norton, KS | 6.0 | 100 | |||
| November 16 | 6:42 PM CST | EF2 | Carson, TX | 10.4 | 175 | |||
| November 16 | 6:44 PM CST | EF0 | Ochiltree, TX | 3.7 | 100 | |||
| November 16 | 6:46 PM CST | EF2 | Gaines, TX | 5.6 | 100 | |||
| November 16 | 6:52 PM CST | EF1 | Ochiltree, TX | 5.8 | 200 | |||
| November 16 | 6:55 PM CST | EF2 | Gray, KS | 14.9 | 500 | |||
| November 16 | 7:00 PM CST | EF1 | Ochiltree, TX to OK | 5.2 | 400 | |||
| November 16 | 7:06 PM CST | EF3 | Gray, TX | 10.9 | 500 | |||
| November 16 | 7:06 PM CST | EF0 | Trego, KS | 1.7 | 100 | |||
| November 16 | 7:10 PM CST | EF1 | Norton, KS | 3.9 | 400 | $83,000 | ||
| November 16 | 7:10 PM CST | EF0 | Beaver, OK | 4.2 | 100 | |||
| November 16 | 7:22 PM CST | EF1 | Gray, TX | 16.0 | 300 | |||
| November 16 | 7:24 PM CST | EF1 | Norton, KS to NE | 18.4 | 400 | $50,000 | ||
| November 16 | 7:43 PM CST | EF0 | Hutchinson, TX | 0.6 | 50 | |||
| November 16 | 7:45 PM CST | EF0 | Roberts, TX | 7.2 | 50 | |||
| November 16 | 7:58 PM CST | EF0 | Potter, TX | 0.4 | 50 | |||
| November 16 | 8:13 PM CST | EF1 | Comanche, KS | 16.1 | 810 | |||
| November 16 | 8:19 PM CST | EF1 | Trego, KS | 0.8 | 100 | |||
| November 16 | 8:20 PM CST | EF1 | Hemphill, TX to OK | 43.0 | 200 | |||
| November 16 | 8:26 PM CST | EF1 | Ochiltree, TX | 14.6 | 70 | |||
| November 16 | 8:38 PM CST | EF1 | Comanche, KS | 5.3 | 460 | |||
| November 16 | 8:59 PM CST | EF0 | Lipscomb, TX | 4.7 | 100 | |||
| November 16 | 9:18 PM CST | EF2 | Harper, OK | 27.2 | 400 | $7,000 | ||
| November 16 | 9:24 PM CST | EF1 | Beaver, OK | 8.9 | 500 | |||
| November 16 | 10:09 PM CST | EF1 | Woods, OK | 3.3 | 200 |
What this means
Ratings are the survey's, read off the damage rather than measured; the rating scale is above. Tornado counts rise through the record as reporting improved, so a year in the 1950s is not comparable with one today except for the strongest tornadoes, which were always noticed.
Sources
NOAA Storm Prediction Center tornado database, 1950-2025, the official record kept by NOAA's Storm Prediction Center.