Virginia, 2026

Drought in Virginia, June 1 to 30, 2026

June 1 to 30, 2026 · NWS RNK · 27 events in 27 counties and zones

00 inches. This ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period, with locally lower percentiles in the 25 to 50 percent of normal.

Where it happened

Every event with a place to put it; 27 filed by county or forecast zone are drawn at its center, in a lighter ring. Tap one for its entry below.

  • Tornadoes
  • Tropical storms and surge
  • Floods
  • Wind
  • Hail
  • Winter weather
  • Heat and drought
  • Cold
  • Fire, smoke and dust
  • Marine and coastal
  • Other

Open the live radar over this ground

The toll

Deaths
0
Injuries
0
Property damage
None recorded
Crop damage
None recorded
Events
27

Deaths and injuries are direct and indirect together, as the offices filed them. Damage is property and crops in the dollars of the year, not adjusted for inflation, and only where an office estimated it.

What happened

The episode as NWS RNK wrote it up.

Extreme Drought conditions continued across south central Virginia and Severe Drought Conditions continued across SW Virginia in June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, with locally lower totals of 4.00-6.00 inches, but also locally higher totals of 8.00-10.00 inches. This ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period, with locally lower percentiles in the 25 to 50 percent of normal. These continued dry conditions combined with the dry fall and early winter conditions leading up to below average rainfall in November, December, January, February, March, April, and May contributed to a continued decline in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 10th percentile for groundwater, and 2nd percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 1st of May. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the James, Roanoke, New, and Dan River basins, which were all observed to be around the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

What forecasters said that day

The local office's own words before the first event, as it sent them, from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of National Weather Service text.

NWS Blacksburg, VA wrote its last area forecast discussion before the first event at May 31, 7:03 PM EST, 4 hours 57 minutes earlier. Its key messages:

  • KEY MESSAGE 1: Widely scattered showers and isolated thunderstorms are forecast on Tuesday as a cold front and associated upper level disturbance pass across the lower Mid- Atlantic.
Area forecast discussion, May 31, 7:03 PM EST, 4 hours 57 minutes before
Area Forecast Discussion
National Weather Service Blacksburg VA
803 PM EDT Sun May 31 2026

.WHAT HAS CHANGED...
Updated the aviation forecast.

Monday has trended drier, but Tuesday still appears to have
widely scattered mountain showers/storms.

&&

.KEY MESSAGES...
KEY MESSAGE 1: Widely scattered showers and isolated
thunderstorms are forecast on Tuesday as a cold front and
associated upper level disturbance pass across the lower Mid-
Atlantic.

&&

.DISCUSSION...
KEY MESSAGE 1...Widely scattered showers and isolated
thunderstorms are forecast for Tuesday as a cold front and
associated upper level disturbance pass across the lower Mid-
Atlantic.

Trough will remain over the eastern US through Monday with a
stalled front remaining well south of the forecast area. This
will keep dry conditions in the forecast through tonight. Will
see some moisture increase on Monday across the Carolinas and
could be enough for isolated afternoon mountain showers to
develop during peak heating.

On Tuesday, storms will likely prove more widespread than the
isolated activity triggered on Monday. However, surface high
pressure and pools of dry air may work to inhibit deep storm
development. Given the lack of deep moisture returning to the
area, any rainfall is forecasted to remain brief in duration.
Likewise, any storms that do manage to develop are not expected
to become severe.

Wednesday through Friday will bring dry conditions and mostly
sunny skies, keeping the region pleasant before the next weather
system threatens to bring more rain by next weekend.

Mountain communities will enjoy highs in the 70s through
Monday, followed by a cooler dip into the 60s and low 70s on
Tuesday and Wednesday, before rebounding back into the upper 70s
to lower 80s late in the week. Meanwhile, the foothills and
Piedmont will experience highs mostly in the 70s, though
thermometers will flirt with the 80s both today and Monday.
After a slightly cooler stretch mid-week, a significant warming
trend will arrive by next Friday and Saturday, pushing
temperatures into the upper 80s to lower 90.

&&

.AVIATION /00Z MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY/...
Mainly high clouds passing over the forecast area...bases ABV
10kft. There is a secondary layer between 4-8KFT creeping into
the southwest part of the forecast area but conditions still
primarily VFR. Surface winds are expected to remain light
through the overnight...under 10 kts. Any river fog will be
mainly confined to WV and areas to the north, mainly impacting
LWB. BLF/BCB could see some light mist toward morning with tempo
MVFR.

Monday will be another quiet day with VFR at all terminals
through the end of the TAF period as high pressure continues to
push into the area. The biggest change tomorrow will be wind
direction, as southerly wind shifts to the north/northwest
behind a weak frontal passage Monday morning...and then become
northeast Monday afternoon.

Confidence in the above forecast is moderate to high.

EXTENDED AVIATION OUTLOOK...

A few stray afternoon showers/storms may occur along the NC/VA line
Monday afternoon and evening, but will be unlikely to directly
affect any terminals. DAN should be just far enough north to
avoid any rain, though it cannot be completely ruled out. VFR
will continue at all terminals into Monday night. Patchy fog
again is possible Monday night, which could cause sub-VFR
conditions, likely confined to BLF/LWB. A better chance of
scattered showers/storms returns on Tuesday, at least for all
terminals except DAN/LYH. Any rain would bring brief sub-VFR.
Beginning Tuesday night, high pressure fully engulfs the area,
keeping quiet and dry conditions in place through the rest of
the week. Due to this, VFR is expected to continue at all
terminals. Patchy fog remains possible each overnight, mostly
confined to the valleys.

&&

.RNK WATCHES/WARNINGS/ADVISORIES...
VA...None.
NC...None.
WV...None.

&&

DISCUSSION...BMG/RCS
AVIATION...PM/JCB
Hazardous weather outlook, May 31, 1:31 PM EST, 10 hours 29 minutes before
Hazardous Weather Outlook
National Weather Service Blacksburg VA
231 PM EDT Sun May 31 2026

NCZ001>006-018>020-VAZ007-009>020-022>024-032>035-043>047-058-059-
WVZ042>044-507-508-011845-
Ashe-Alleghany NC-Surry-Stokes-Rockingham-Caswell-Watauga-Wilkes-
Yadkin-Tazewell-Smyth-Bland-Giles-Wythe-Pulaski-Montgomery-Grayson-
Carroll-Floyd-Craig-Alleghany VA-Bath-Roanoke-Botetourt-Rockbridge-
Patrick-Franklin-Bedford-Amherst-Henry-Pittsylvania-Campbell-
Appomattox-Buckingham-Halifax-Charlotte-Mercer-Summers-Monroe-
Eastern Greenbrier-Western Greenbrier-
231 PM EDT Sun May 31 2026

This Hazardous Weather Outlook is for north central North Carolina,
northwest North Carolina, central Virginia, south central Virginia,
southwest Virginia, west central Virginia and southeast West
Virginia.

.DAY ONE...This afternoon and tonight.

No hazardous weather is expected at this time.

.DAYS TWO THROUGH SEVEN...Monday through Saturday.

The probability for widespread hazardous weather is low.

.SPOTTER INFORMATION STATEMENT...

Spotter activation is not expected at this time.

The radar

The national radar mosaic for the moment the first event began.

Open the radar archive at this moment

Event by event

27 drought. Local standard time, as filed.

Drought, Alleghany

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Alleghany forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.791, -80.000 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Severe Drought conditions continued in Alleghany county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 10th percentile for groundwater, and 30th to 70th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Jackson River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Amherst

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Amherst forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.605, -79.145 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions continued in Amherst county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the James River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Appomattox

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Appomattox forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.372, -78.812 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions improved to Severe Drought conditions in Appomattox county late June after a few rainfall events brought some rain to the county. Drought conditions lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 10th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the James River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Bath

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Bath forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
38.059, -79.741 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions improved to Moderate Drought conditions in Bath county by the end of June after a few rainfall events brought some rain to the county. Drought conditions lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 10.00-15.00 inches, which ended up being 75 to 90 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 10th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Cowpasture River, which was observed to be below the 25th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Bedford

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Bedford forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.315, -79.524 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions improved to Severe Drought conditions in Bedford county in late June after a few rainfall events brought some rain to the county. Drought conditions lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 5th to 10th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the James River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Bland

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Bland forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.134, -81.130 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Severe Drought conditions continued in Bland county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Walker Creek, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Botetourt

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Botetourt forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.557, -79.812 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Severe Drought conditions continued in Botetourt county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 5th to 10th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the James River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Buckingham

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Buckingham forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.572, -78.529 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions continued in Buckingham county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 20th to 30th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the James River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Campbell

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Campbell forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.310, -79.119 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions continued in Campbell county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Roanoke River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Carroll

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Carroll forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.697, -80.829 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions improved to Severe Drought conditions in Carroll county through the end of June after a few rainfall events brought some rain to the county. Drought conditions lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 10th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the New River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Charlotte

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Charlotte forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.012, -78.662 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions continued in Charlotte county through late June with minor improvements after some rainfall across the county. Drought conditions lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 30th to 70th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Roanoke River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Craig

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Craig forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.481, -80.212 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Severe Drought conditions continued in Craig county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Johns Creek, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Floyd

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Floyd forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.932, -80.362 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions improved to Severe Drought conditions in Floyd county through late June after a few rainfall events brought much needed rain to the county. Drought conditions lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 2nd percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Little River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Franklin

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Franklin forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.992, -79.881 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions continued in Franklin county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 5th to 10th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Blackwater River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Giles

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Giles forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.314, -80.704 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Severe Drought conditions continued in Giles county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the New River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Grayson

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Grayson forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.657, -81.225 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions improved to Severe Drought conditions in Grayson county through late June. Drought conditions lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the New River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Halifax

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Halifax forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.767, -78.937 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions continued in Halifax county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 20th to 30th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Dan River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Henry

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Henry forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.689, -79.926 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions continued in Henry county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 2nd percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Smith River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Montgomery

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Montgomery forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.174, -80.387 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Severe Drought conditions continued in Montgomery county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 2nd percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the New River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Patrick

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Patrick forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.678, -80.284 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions continued in Patrick county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 2nd to 5th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Mayo River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Pittsylvania

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Pittsylvania forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.704, -79.396 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions continued in Pittsylvania county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 10th to 20th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Dan River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Pulaski

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Pulaski forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.098, -80.645 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Severe Drought conditions continued in Pulaski county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 2nd percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the New River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Roanoke

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Roanoke forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.258, -80.016 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Severe Drought conditions continued in Roanoke county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 5th to 10th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Roanoke River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Rockbridge

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Rockbridge forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.774, -79.418 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions improved to Severe Drought conditions in Rockbridge county through late June. Drought conditions lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 6.00-8.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 2nd percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Maury River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Smyth

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Smyth forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.844, -81.537 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions improved to Severe drought conditions in Smyth county through late June after several rainfall events. Drought conditions lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 10.00-15.00 inches, which ended up being 75 to 90 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 10th percentile for groundwater, and 30th to 70th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Holston River, which was observed to be below the 10th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Tazewell

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Tazewell forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
37.125, -81.561 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Extreme Drought conditions improved significantly to Moderate Drought conditions in Tazewell county through late June after several rainfall events. Drought conditions still lingered; however, after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 10.00-15.00 inches, which ended up being 75 to 90 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 10th percentile for groundwater, and 30th to 70th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the Clinch River, which was observed to be below the 25th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

Drought, Wythe

When
June 1, 12:00 AM EST to June 30, 12:00 AM EST
Where
Wythe forecast zone
Reported by
Drought Monitor
Coordinates
36.917, -81.079 (the zone’s center; the record gives no point)

Severe Drought conditions continued in Wythe county through late June after the previous several months of March, April, and May recorded precipitation totals of 8.00-10.00 inches, which ended up being 50 to 75 percent of normal for that period. These dry conditions combined with the dry fall conditions leading up to below average rainfall during the winter months, contributed to a rapid decrease in groundwater and soil moisture in this region, where observed values for each had fallen to at or below the 5th percentile for groundwater, and 5th to 10th percentile for soil moisture in the first 0-100 cm based off the NASA SPoRT LIS data estimated on the 30th of June. Streamflows similarly decreased across the area. This included the New River, which was observed to be below the 5th percentile per the USGS WaterWatch website and, in some cases, were near record-low flows.

What these are

Drought
A drought reaching severe (D2) or worse on the US Drought Monitor, or with notable impacts.

After NWS Directive 10-1605, the rules offices file Storm Data by.

The same day elsewhere

More

Every storm in Virginia in 2026Every state in 2026This day in weather historyWarnings in Virginia, June 2026

Sources

NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Storm Events Database, compiled from the National Weather Service’s monthly Storm Data. Complete through 2026-06; NCEI adds each month about 75 days after it ends and revises past years a few times a year. Rebuilt 2026-09-24. Each event’s entry at NCEI: 1356015, 1356026, 1356038, 1356090, 1356091, 1356092, 1356093, 1356102, 1356111, 1356402, 1356416, 1356430, 1356433, 1356451, 1356471, 1356498, 1356503, 1356504, 1356508, 1356528, 1356534, 1356537, 1356539, 1356540, 1356541, 1356542, 1356543.