Tornadoes · United States · Oklahoma · 2003
F0 tornado, Guymon to Goodwell, Oklahoma, May 15, 2003
From Guymon to Goodwell, this F0 tornado ran 0.5 miles across Texas County on May 15, 2003, touching down at 7:35 PM CDT and reaching 20 yards wide. It killed nobody, and did $10,000 of property damage.
The rating scale
Tracks are drawn in the color of the rating. The Fujita scale rates the damage rather than measuring the wind: the speeds are what that damage is taken to imply.
F040 to 72 mphthis tornado
Light damage. Surface peeled off some roofs, gutters and siding damaged, branches broken, shallow-rooted trees pushed over.
F173 to 112 mph
Moderate damage. Roofs badly stripped, mobile homes overturned or badly damaged, exterior doors lost, windows broken.
F2113 to 157 mph
Considerable damage. Roofs torn off well-built houses, frame homes shifted on their foundations, mobile homes destroyed, large trees snapped or uprooted, cars lifted off the ground.
F3158 to 206 mph
Severe damage. Whole stories of well-built houses destroyed, large buildings badly damaged, trains overturned, trees debarked, heavy cars lifted and thrown.
F4207 to 260 mph
Devastating damage. Well-built houses leveled, structures with weak foundations moved some distance, cars thrown and large missiles generated.
F5261 to 318 mph
Incredible damage. Strong frame houses swept off their foundations, car-sized missiles thrown more than 100 meters, steel-reinforced concrete badly damaged, high-rise buildings deformed.
Unrated
The survey recorded a tornado but could not put a number on it, most often because it crossed open country and damaged nothing a rating can be read from.
The record
- Rating
- F0
- Date
- May 15, 2003
- Touchdown
- 7:35 PM CDT (00:35 UTC)
- Path length
- 0.5 miles (0.8 km)
- Path width
- 20 yards (18 m)
- Deaths
- 0
- Injuries
- 0
- Property damage
- $10,000
- County
- Texas County
- Touchdown point
- 36.680, -101.480
- Lift-off point
- 36.680, -101.480
- Record number
- 1066
What the Weather Service recorded
Severe thunderstorms across the Oklahoma panhandle produced large hail and numerous tornadoes during the late afternoon and evening hours. The tornadoes caused no injuries and were mostly over open country. The tornadoes destroyed a barn and damaged barns and roofs along with knocking down power poles and tree limbs. High winds in the eastern Oklahoma panhandle did cause damage to powerlines and cars...however no injuries occurred.
The tornado remained over open country. The path length and the path width were estimated. No damage or injuries were reported.
No injuries were reported from the tornado...however a roof at the local YMCA sustained damage and shingles were blown off...power poles were knocked down...and tree limbs were broken.
No injuries were reported from the tornado. The path length and path width were estimated. The tornado destroyed a poorly constructed home plus two other homes sustained minor damage.
The tornado remained over open country. The tornado knocked down powerlines north of Texhoma...destroyed one hog barn with major damage to two others...and two homes in rural Texas county received major damage.
From NOAA NCEI's Storm Events Database, the narrative the local forecast office wrote for Storm Data.
The warnings
21 minutes of warning. NWS AMA issued a tornado warning for this county at 00:14 UTC, 21 minutes before the tornado touched down, in force until 01:15 UTC.
| Issued (UTC) | Expired | Product | Office |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21:54 UTC | 22:45 UTC | Tornado Warning | AMA |
| 23:11 UTC | 00:15 UTC | Tornado Warning | AMA |
| 00:14 UTC | 01:15 UTC | Tornado Warning | AMA |
| 01:14 UTC | 02:15 UTC | Tornado Warning | AMA |
Every warning and watch covering the touchdown point that day, from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of National Weather Service products. Lead time is measured from the issue of the warning in force to the touchdown time in the database, both of which were recorded to the minute by different people.
The forecast that day
The Storm Prediction Center had this point in a High Risk, with a 0.25 chance of a tornado within 25 miles, in the hatched area where significant tornadoes were expected. The outlook in force was issued at 19:31 UTC.
SPC's Day 1 convective outlook as it stood when the tornado began, read at the touchdown point. The same archive is on the radar archive.
The air that afternoon
The radiosonde launches on either side of the tornado, from the nearest station that was launching then, drawn and analyzed the way Storm Lab does: the same diagram, the same parcel and shear definitions SPC's mesoanalysis uses.
Amarillo Airport, TX (KAMA), 00:00Z
0.6 hours before the tornado, 162 km from the path. May 16, 2003.
- Mixed-layer CAPE
- 2687 J/kg
- Mixed-layer CIN
- -75 J/kg
- Surface CAPE
- 3168 J/kg
- Mixed-layer LCL
- 1311 m above ground
- 0-6 km bulk shear
- 82 kt
- 0-1 km bulk shear
- 28 kt
- 0-1 km storm-relative helicity
- 213 m²/s²
- 0-3 km storm-relative helicity
- 482 m²/s²
- Significant tornado parameter
- 4.0
- Supercell composite
- 19.9
- 0-3 km lapse rate
- 7.5 K/km
Amarillo Airport, TX (KAMA), 12:00Z
11.4 hours after it, 162 km from the path. May 16, 2003.
- Mixed-layer CAPE
- 45 J/kg
- Mixed-layer CIN
- -48 J/kg
- Surface CAPE
- 25 J/kg
- Mixed-layer LCL
- 808 m above ground
- 0-6 km bulk shear
- 21 kt
- 0-1 km bulk shear
- 14 kt
- 0-1 km storm-relative helicity
- -36 m²/s²
- 0-3 km storm-relative helicity
- -32 m²/s²
- Significant tornado parameter
- 0.0
- Supercell composite
- 0.0
- 0-3 km lapse rate
- 6.2 K/km
The surface observations
Guymon (GUY), 2 km from the path, in the two hours either side.
| Time (UTC) | Temp (°F) | Dew point (°F) | Wind | Gust (kt) | Pressure (mb) | Weather |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22:53 UTC | 75 | 60 | 130° 13 kt | 25 | 1003.4 | |
| 23:53 UTC | 74 | 61 | 90° 19 kt | 25 | 1000.3 | |
| 00:24 UTC | 69.8 | 62.6 | 250° 17 kt | 40 | 1000 | -RA |
| 00:27 UTC | 66.2 | 62.6 | 310° 17 kt | 40 | 1000 | +RA BR |
| 00:35 UTC | 71.6 | 62.6 | 240° 13 kt | 38 | 1000.3 | -RA SQ |
| 00:42 UTC | 69.8 | 62.6 | 260° 15 kt | 32 | 1000.3 | -RA |
| 00:53 UTC | 70 | 63 | 330° 6 kt | 1000.7 | ||
| 01:35 UTC | 62.6 | 60.8 | 360° 28 kt | 38 | 1001.4 | +RA BR SQ |
| 01:39 UTC | 62.6 | 60.8 | 360° 28 kt | 36 | 1000.7 | +RA BR |
| 01:53 UTC | 61 | 60 | 20° 28 kt | 36 | 1002.4 | +RA BR |
| 02:03 UTC | 62.6 | 60.8 | 20° 25 kt | 32 | 1001.7 | -RA BR |
| 02:15 UTC | 60.8 | 57.2 | 10° 30 kt | 35 | 1002.4 | -RA |
From the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of airport observations.
The radar
The Amarillo radar (KAMA), 162 km away, was scanning. The volume nearest the touchdown began at 00:33 UTC.
Open the radar archive at this moment, over the track
Reflectivity and velocity, decoded from the Level II archive in the browser. Volumes take a few seconds to open the first time.
This ground now
The live radar over the trackEvery 2003 tornado in OklahomaEvery tornado in Oklahoma since 1950Warnings in force in Oklahoma nowThe forecast where you are
The other tornadoes of May 15, 2003
46 more were confirmed in the United States that day.
| Date | Time | Rating | Where | Path (mi) | Width (yd) | Deaths | Injuries | Damage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 15 | 5:10 PM EDT | F1 | Knox, TN | 2.5 | 50 | $150,000 | ||
| May 15 | 4:12 PM CDT | F0 | Cimarron, OK | 0.1 | 100 | |||
| May 15 | 5:15 PM EDT | F1 | Knox, TN | 1.5 | 50 | $200,000 | ||
| May 15 | 4:25 PM CDT | F1 | Cimarron, OK | 5.0 | 200 | $40,000 | ||
| May 15 | 3:39 PM MDT | F2 | Baca, CO | 5.0 | 200 | $120,000 | ||
| May 15 | 3:42 PM MDT | F0 | Kiowa, CO | 1.0 | 75 | |||
| May 15 | 4:45 PM CDT | F0 | Cimarron, OK | 0.1 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 6:20 PM EDT | F1 | Lincoln, NC | 3.0 | 100 | $50,000 | ||
| May 15 | 5:36 PM CDT | F1 | Dallam, TX | 10.0 | 1,320 | $30,000 | ||
| May 15 | 5:41 PM CDT | F0 | Dallam, TX | 1.0 | 500 | $10,000 | ||
| May 15 | 6:46 PM CDT | F0 | Texas, OK | 0.1 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 7:20 PM CDT | F0 | Texas, OK | 0.5 | 30 | |||
| May 15 | 7:29 PM CDT | F2 | Seward, KS | 2.5 | 100 | $6.0 million | ||
| May 15 | 7:38 PM CDT | F0 | Sherman, TX | 1.0 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 7:40 PM CDT | F2 | Seward, KS | 4.9 | 100 | $150,000 | ||
| May 15 | 7:45 PM CDT | F0 | Texas, OK | 0.3 | 100 | $20,000 | ||
| May 15 | 7:58 PM CDT | F0 | Moore, TX | 6.0 | 200 | |||
| May 15 | 8:15 PM CDT | F0 | Sherman, TX | 0.1 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 8:15 PM CDT | F0 | Sherman, TX | 0.1 | 20 | |||
| May 15 | 8:30 PM CDT | F0 | Gray, TX | 0.1 | 40 | |||
| May 15 | 8:31 PM CDT | F0 | Sherman, TX | 0.3 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 8:33 PM CDT | F1 | Texas, OK | 2.0 | 30 | $30,000 | ||
| May 15 | 8:37 PM CDT | F0 | Donley, TX | 0.5 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 8:42 PM CDT | F0 | Jones, TX | 0.3 | 20 | $1,000 | ||
| May 15 | 8:45 PM CDT | F0 | Texas, OK | 1.0 | 40 | |||
| May 15 | 8:59 PM CDT | F1 | Shackelford, TX | 2.0 | 150 | $10,000 | ||
| May 15 | 8:59 PM CDT | F0 | Donley, TX | 0.1 | 20 | |||
| May 15 | 9:00 PM CDT | F0 | Beaver, OK | 0.8 | 20 | |||
| May 15 | 9:10 PM CDT | F1 | Meade, KS | 2.0 | 100 | $300,000 | ||
| May 15 | 9:23 PM CDT | F0 | Hutchinson, TX | 2.0 | 30 | |||
| May 15 | 9:25 PM CDT | F2 | Shackelford, TX | 1.5 | 800 | $50,000 | ||
| May 15 | 9:25 PM CDT | F2 | Shackelford, TX | 1.5 | 450 | $3,000 | ||
| May 15 | 9:30 PM CDT | F2 | Seward, KS | 2.5 | 100 | $8.0 million | ||
| May 15 | 9:43 PM CDT | F1 | Wheeler, TX | 18.0 | 100 | $150,000 | ||
| May 15 | 9:44 PM CDT | F0 | Carson, TX | 0.1 | 20 | |||
| May 15 | 9:45 PM CDT | F1 | Meade, KS | 1.0 | 50 | $50,000 | ||
| May 15 | 10:00 PM CDT | F0 | Eastland, TX | 12.0 | 300 | $100,000 | ||
| May 15 | 10:10 PM CDT | F0 | Shackelford, TX | 1.0 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 10:12 PM CDT | F1 | Shackelford, TX | 1.0 | 150 | |||
| May 15 | 10:30 PM CDT | F0 | Wheeler, TX | 0.5 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 10:36 PM CDT | F0 | Clark, KS | 1.3 | 100 | |||
| May 15 | 10:53 PM CDT | F2 | Wheeler, TX to OK | 15.5 | 1,760 | $270,000 | ||
| May 15 | 11:13 PM CDT | F0 | Eastland, TX | 0.1 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 11:21 PM CDT | F0 | Wheeler, TX | 0.1 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 11:42 PM CDT | F0 | Ford, KS | 0.8 | 50 | |||
| May 15 | 11:58 PM CDT | F1 | Ford, KS | 2.0 | 50 |
What this means
Ratings are the survey's, read off the damage rather than measured; the rating scale is above. Tornado counts rise through the record as reporting improved, so a year in the 1950s is not comparable with one today except for the strongest tornadoes, which were always noticed.
Sources
NOAA Storm Prediction Center tornado database, 1950-2025, the official record kept by NOAA's Storm Prediction Center.