Tornadoes · United States · Oklahoma · 2003

F0 tornado, Griggs, Oklahoma, May 15, 2003

This F0 tornado ran 0.1 miles across Cimarron County on May 15, 2003, touching down at 4:45 PM CDT and reaching 50 yards wide. It killed nobody.

The rating scale

Tracks are drawn in the color of the rating. The Fujita scale rates the damage rather than measuring the wind: the speeds are what that damage is taken to imply.

  1. F040 to 72 mphthis tornado

    Light damage. Surface peeled off some roofs, gutters and siding damaged, branches broken, shallow-rooted trees pushed over.

  2. F173 to 112 mph

    Moderate damage. Roofs badly stripped, mobile homes overturned or badly damaged, exterior doors lost, windows broken.

  3. F2113 to 157 mph

    Considerable damage. Roofs torn off well-built houses, frame homes shifted on their foundations, mobile homes destroyed, large trees snapped or uprooted, cars lifted off the ground.

  4. F3158 to 206 mph

    Severe damage. Whole stories of well-built houses destroyed, large buildings badly damaged, trains overturned, trees debarked, heavy cars lifted and thrown.

  5. F4207 to 260 mph

    Devastating damage. Well-built houses leveled, structures with weak foundations moved some distance, cars thrown and large missiles generated.

  6. F5261 to 318 mph

    Incredible damage. Strong frame houses swept off their foundations, car-sized missiles thrown more than 100 meters, steel-reinforced concrete badly damaged, high-rise buildings deformed.

  7. Unrated

    The survey recorded a tornado but could not put a number on it, most often because it crossed open country and damaged nothing a rating can be read from.

The record

Rating
F0
Date
May 15, 2003
Touchdown
4:45 PM CDT (21:45 UTC)
Path length
0.1 miles (0.2 km)
Path width
50 yards (46 m)
Deaths
0
Injuries
0
County
Cimarron County
Touchdown point
36.600, -102.120
Lift-off point
36.600, -102.120
Record number
1063

What the Weather Service recorded

Severe thunderstorms across the Oklahoma panhandle produced large hail and numerous tornadoes during the late afternoon and evening hours. The tornadoes caused no injuries and were mostly over open country. The tornadoes destroyed a barn and damaged barns and roofs along with knocking down power poles and tree limbs. High winds in the eastern Oklahoma panhandle did cause damage to powerlines and cars...however no injuries occurred.

The tornado path length and path width were estimated. No damage or injuries were reported.

From NOAA NCEI's Storm Events Database, the narrative the local forecast office wrote for Storm Data.

The warnings

26 minutes of warning. NWS AMA issued a tornado warning for this county at 21:19 UTC, 26 minutes before the tornado touched down, in force until 22:00 UTC.

Issued (UTC)ExpiredProductOffice
20:51 UTC21:45 UTCSevere Thunderstorm WarningAMA
21:19 UTC22:00 UTCTornado WarningAMA
21:54 UTC22:45 UTCTornado WarningAMA
22:45 UTC23:45 UTCTornado WarningAMA
23:55 UTC01:00 UTCTornado WarningAMA
01:00 UTC02:00 UTCTornado WarningAMA

Every warning and watch covering the touchdown point that day, from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of National Weather Service products. Lead time is measured from the issue of the warning in force to the touchdown time in the database, both of which were recorded to the minute by different people.

The forecast that day

The Storm Prediction Center had this point in a High Risk, with a 0.25 chance of a tornado within 25 miles, in the hatched area where significant tornadoes were expected. The outlook in force was issued at 19:31 UTC.

SPC's Day 1 convective outlook as it stood when the tornado began, read at the touchdown point. The same archive is on the radar archive.

The air that afternoon

The radiosonde launches on either side of the tornado, from the nearest station that was launching then, drawn and analyzed the way Storm Lab does: the same diagram, the same parcel and shear definitions SPC's mesoanalysis uses.

Amarillo Airport, TX (KAMA), 12:00Z

9.8 hours before the tornado, 157 km from the path. May 15, 2003.

Skew-T log-pSkew-T log-p diagram, Amarillo Airport, TX at 12:00Z on 2003-05-15Temperature and dew point through the depth of the atmosphere, with the mixed-layer parcel lifted from the surface. Mixed-layer CAPE 95 joules per kilogram, CIN -275, lifted condensation level 1781 meters above ground. Wind barbs in knots down the right edge.LCLLFCEL10008507005003002001001 km2 km3 km6 km9 km12 km15 km-30°-20°-10°10°20°30°40°
Temperature in red, dew point in green, the mixed-layer parcel dashed. The warm shading is its CAPE, the cool shading the inhibition it has to break through.
HodographHodograph, Amarillo Airport, TX at 12:00Z on 2003-05-15The wind through the lowest 10 kilometers as a curve, rings every 10 meters per second labeled in knots. Zero to 1 km storm-relative helicity 88 square meters per square second, 0 to 6 km bulk shear 43 knots.1939587897Sfc1 km3 km6 km9 kmRMLM
The wind turning with height, colored by layer: ground to 1 km, 1 to 3 km, 3 to 6 km, 6 to 10 km. RM and LM are the right and left moving storms Bunkers' method gives; the shaded area is the 0 to 1 km storm-relative helicity.
Mixed-layer CAPE
95 J/kg
Mixed-layer CIN
-275 J/kg
Surface CAPE
1371 J/kg
Mixed-layer LCL
1781 m above ground
0-6 km bulk shear
43 kt
0-1 km bulk shear
9 kt
0-1 km storm-relative helicity
88 m²/s²
0-3 km storm-relative helicity
122 m²/s²
Significant tornado parameter
0.0
Supercell composite
0.2
0-3 km lapse rate
5.5 K/km

Open this sounding in Storm Lab

Amarillo Airport, TX (KAMA), 00:00Z

2.2 hours after it, 157 km from the path. May 16, 2003.

Skew-T log-pSkew-T log-p diagram, Amarillo Airport, TX at 00:00Z on 2003-05-16Temperature and dew point through the depth of the atmosphere, with the mixed-layer parcel lifted from the surface. Mixed-layer CAPE 2687 joules per kilogram, CIN -75, lifted condensation level 1311 meters above ground. Wind barbs in knots down the right edge.LCLLFCEL10008507005003002001001 km2 km3 km6 km9 km12 km15 km-30°-20°-10°10°20°30°40°
Temperature in red, dew point in green, the mixed-layer parcel dashed. The warm shading is its CAPE, the cool shading the inhibition it has to break through.
HodographHodograph, Amarillo Airport, TX at 00:00Z on 2003-05-16The wind through the lowest 10 kilometers as a curve, rings every 10 meters per second labeled in knots. Zero to 1 km storm-relative helicity 213 square meters per square second, 0 to 6 km bulk shear 82 knots.1939587897Sfc1 km3 km6 km9 kmRMLM
The wind turning with height, colored by layer: ground to 1 km, 1 to 3 km, 3 to 6 km, 6 to 10 km. RM and LM are the right and left moving storms Bunkers' method gives; the shaded area is the 0 to 1 km storm-relative helicity.
Mixed-layer CAPE
2687 J/kg
Mixed-layer CIN
-75 J/kg
Surface CAPE
3168 J/kg
Mixed-layer LCL
1311 m above ground
0-6 km bulk shear
82 kt
0-1 km bulk shear
28 kt
0-1 km storm-relative helicity
213 m²/s²
0-3 km storm-relative helicity
482 m²/s²
Significant tornado parameter
4.0
Supercell composite
19.9
0-3 km lapse rate
7.5 K/km

Open this sounding in Storm Lab

The surface observations

Elkhart (EHA), 49 km from the path, in the two hours either side.

Time (UTC)Temp (°F)Dew point (°F)WindGust (kt)Pressure (mb)Weather
19:48 UTC8157120° 25 kt
20:08 UTC8257140° 26 kt
20:28 UTC8156.12130° 26 kt
20:48 UTC8355120° 26 kt
21:08 UTC8151130° 29 kt
21:28 UTC7748130° 24 kt
21:48 UTC7647.12140° 22 kt
22:08 UTC7548140° 25 kt
22:28 UTC6755160° 17 kt
22:48 UTC6155120° 23 kt
23:08 UTC6255120° 20 kt
23:28 UTC6052.16120° 14 kt

From the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of airport observations.

The radar

The Amarillo radar (KAMA), 156 km away, was scanning. The volume nearest the touchdown began at 21:42 UTC.

Open the radar archive at this moment, over the track

Reflectivity and velocity, decoded from the Level II archive in the browser. Volumes take a few seconds to open the first time.

This ground now

The live radar over the trackEvery 2003 tornado in OklahomaEvery tornado in Oklahoma since 1950Warnings in force in Oklahoma nowThe forecast where you are

The other tornadoes of May 15, 2003

46 more were confirmed in the United States that day.

DateTimeRatingWherePath (mi)Width (yd)DeathsInjuriesDamage
May 155:10 PM EDTF1Knox, TN2.550$150,000
May 154:12 PM CDTF0Cimarron, OK0.1100
May 155:15 PM EDTF1Knox, TN1.550$200,000
May 154:25 PM CDTF1Cimarron, OK5.0200$40,000
May 153:39 PM MDTF2Baca, CO5.0200$120,000
May 153:42 PM MDTF0Kiowa, CO1.075
May 156:20 PM EDTF1Lincoln, NC3.0100$50,000
May 155:36 PM CDTF1Dallam, TX10.01,320$30,000
May 155:41 PM CDTF0Dallam, TX1.0500$10,000
May 156:46 PM CDTF0Texas, OK0.150
May 157:20 PM CDTF0Texas, OK0.530
May 157:29 PM CDTF2Seward, KS2.5100$6.0 million
May 157:35 PM CDTF0Texas, OK0.520$10,000
May 157:38 PM CDTF0Sherman, TX1.050
May 157:40 PM CDTF2Seward, KS4.9100$150,000
May 157:45 PM CDTF0Texas, OK0.3100$20,000
May 157:58 PM CDTF0Moore, TX6.0200
May 158:15 PM CDTF0Sherman, TX0.150
May 158:15 PM CDTF0Sherman, TX0.120
May 158:30 PM CDTF0Gray, TX0.140
May 158:31 PM CDTF0Sherman, TX0.350
May 158:33 PM CDTF1Texas, OK2.030$30,000
May 158:37 PM CDTF0Donley, TX0.550
May 158:42 PM CDTF0Jones, TX0.320$1,000
May 158:45 PM CDTF0Texas, OK1.040
May 158:59 PM CDTF1Shackelford, TX2.0150$10,000
May 158:59 PM CDTF0Donley, TX0.120
May 159:00 PM CDTF0Beaver, OK0.820
May 159:10 PM CDTF1Meade, KS2.0100$300,000
May 159:23 PM CDTF0Hutchinson, TX2.030
May 159:25 PM CDTF2Shackelford, TX1.5800$50,000
May 159:25 PM CDTF2Shackelford, TX1.5450$3,000
May 159:30 PM CDTF2Seward, KS2.5100$8.0 million
May 159:43 PM CDTF1Wheeler, TX18.0100$150,000
May 159:44 PM CDTF0Carson, TX0.120
May 159:45 PM CDTF1Meade, KS1.050$50,000
May 1510:00 PM CDTF0Eastland, TX12.0300$100,000
May 1510:10 PM CDTF0Shackelford, TX1.050
May 1510:12 PM CDTF1Shackelford, TX1.0150
May 1510:30 PM CDTF0Wheeler, TX0.550
May 1510:36 PM CDTF0Clark, KS1.3100
May 1510:53 PM CDTF2Wheeler, TX to OK15.51,760$270,000
May 1511:13 PM CDTF0Eastland, TX0.150
May 1511:21 PM CDTF0Wheeler, TX0.150
May 1511:42 PM CDTF0Ford, KS0.850
May 1511:58 PM CDTF1Ford, KS2.050

What this means

Ratings are the survey's, read off the damage rather than measured; the rating scale is above. Tornado counts rise through the record as reporting improved, so a year in the 1950s is not comparable with one today except for the strongest tornadoes, which were always noticed.

Sources

NOAA Storm Prediction Center tornado database, 1950-2025, the official record kept by NOAA's Storm Prediction Center.