Tsunamis in 1895

March 9, 1895 Tsunami: S. California, United States

March 9, 1895 · Questionable tsunami

A tsunami caused by a landslide began at S. California, United States on March 9, 1895. Its effects were recorded at 1 place.

Where the waves reached

The source (white) and every runup with a place, colored by the water height recorded there. A ring is a runup NCEI marks doubtful.

  • Under 1 m
  • 1 to 3 m
  • 3 to 10 m
  • 10 to 30 m
  • 30 m and more
  • Height not recorded

Tsunami warnings in force

The tsunami

Date
March 9, 1895
Source
S. California, United States
Cause
Landslide
Runups recorded
1
Waters
Ocean
How certain
Questionable tsunami

The toll

The record gives no deaths, injuries or damage for this tsunami.

What the record says

NCEI’s account, from the sources it cites.

1895, March 9 and 30. "A strange seismic disturbance is reported from Costa Harbor, San Miguel Island. The land forming the high bluffs back of the boathouse is said to have sunk sixty feet perpendicular, forcing the beach and rocks strewn along it for a length of 1,800 feet some 30 feet upward and some 600 feet outward into the harbor. The change occurred on the 9th of March and the ground is reported to be still moving" (Los Angeles Sunday Times, March 17, 1895, p. 15, vol. 4). Joy (1968) describes events on these dates giving the dates as March 8, 10, and 30 as "A highly questionable series of events. A small schooner was wrecked while in the harbor on San Miguel Island, possibly a landslide triggered by an earthquake."

Townley and Allen (1939) cite an article in a newspaper of March 17 but did not identify it. They think the story was worked up by a newspaper reported into a very sensational story. There was no mention of the events in the Santa Barbara Free Press of March 10 to 12 or March 31 to April 1. The Santa Barbara Daily Independent, the apparent source of these reports, could not be located for March.

The Daily Independent for April 2 states, "News must be very scarce in Santa Barbara when the correspondents of outside papers have to resort to fakes, pure and simple, to make their daily budget..."

Costa Harbor can not be located. The only harbor on the island is Cuyler's Harbor and has been known as that since 1852. The initial Los Angeles Sunday Times report seems like a very detailed description of a large coastal land slide of a rotational type, pushing its toe upward and outwards...The description of the noise, the visible and sensible effects of the shock on the vessel and the "disturbed" water would be consistent for alarge subaerial landslide into the water with or without a triggering earthquake if the vessel were near shore. It could be a belated report of the event of March 9 or a continuation of the landsliding at a later date.

A landslide into the ocean could generate a local tsunami if it had occurred rapidly as the "noise" would suggest. However, there is nothing in these descriptions to suggest a wave beyond the "disturbance" of the water. Validity 2.

above from reference #237.

1895, March 8/10 or 30. A small schooner, riding in the harbor at San Miguel Island, was damaged by a slide caused by an earthquake. Neither the earthquake nor the tsunami was noticed on the continental coast (Reference #415).

Every runup

Nearest the source first. Heights are above sea level at the time; a tide gauge reads half the wave’s full height.

WhereCountryKm from sourceWater height, mInland, mMeasured byFirst wave, UTCDeaths
San Miguel Island, CA, CA doubtfulUnited StatesEyewitness observation of water height

More

Every tsunami in 1895The 1800sTsunamis of United StatesThis day in weather historyAlerts in force

Sources

Tsunami events and runups from NOAA’s National Centers for Environmental Information, Global Historical Hazard Database, cited as NCEI/WDS, doi:10.7289/V5PN93H7. Public domain. Read 2026-09-24. NCEI tsunami event 1221.