Tornadoes · United States · Utah · 2022

EF2 tornado, Fruitland, Utah, June 19, 2022

This EF2 tornado ran 2.1 miles across Duchesne County on June 19, 2022, touching down at 9:13 AM MDT and reaching 880 yards wide. It killed nobody.

The rating scale

Tracks are drawn in the color of the rating. The Enhanced Fujita scale rates the damage rather than measuring the wind: the speeds are what that damage is taken to imply.

  1. EF065 to 85 mph

    Light damage. Surface peeled off some roofs, gutters and siding damaged, branches broken, shallow-rooted trees pushed over.

  2. EF186 to 110 mph

    Moderate damage. Roofs badly stripped, mobile homes overturned or badly damaged, exterior doors lost, windows broken.

  3. EF2111 to 135 mphthis tornado

    Considerable damage. Roofs torn off well-built houses, frame homes shifted on their foundations, mobile homes destroyed, large trees snapped or uprooted, cars lifted off the ground.

  4. EF3136 to 165 mph

    Severe damage. Whole stories of well-built houses destroyed, large buildings badly damaged, trains overturned, trees debarked, heavy cars lifted and thrown.

  5. EF4166 to 200 mph

    Devastating damage. Well-built houses leveled, structures with weak foundations moved some distance, cars thrown and large missiles generated.

  6. EF5over 200 mph

    Incredible damage. Strong frame houses swept off their foundations, car-sized missiles thrown more than 100 meters, steel-reinforced concrete badly damaged, high-rise buildings deformed.

  7. Unrated

    The survey recorded a tornado but could not put a number on it, most often because it crossed open country and damaged nothing a rating can be read from.

The record

Rating
EF2
Date
June 19, 2022
Touchdown
9:13 AM MDT (15:13 UTC)
Lifted
9:17 AM MDT (15:17 UTC)
On the ground
4 minutes
Path length
2.1 miles (3.3 km)
Path width
880 yards (805 m)
Deaths
0
Injuries
0
County
Duchesne County
Touchdown point
39.882, -110.745
Lift-off point
39.912, -110.739
Record number
2206190913-01

The damage survey

8 damage points were recorded along this path by NWS SLC, in the Damage Assessment Toolkit the survey teams carry. The strongest indicator was rated EF2. The highest wind the damage implies is 125 mph.

  • High density of snapped hardwood trees, as small as 6 inch diameter up to 14 inch diameter. Widespread violent topping of trees noted in this area, next to no trees left standing in the area. Softwood trees up to 24+ inch diameter snapped as well.
  • Edge of damage path where it crossed the road. Part of snapped tree deposited on other side of the road; another snapped tree up high on hillside
  • Apparent left edge of track. Softwood around 24 inch diameter snapped.
  • Two snapped aspens and a snapped softwood, several smaller adjacent trees uprooted.

Survey points are preliminary and are the raw material the published rating was built from. Source: NWS Damage Assessment Toolkit.

What the Weather Service recorded

A widespread high wind event across Utah was followed by strong thunderstorms associated with a system spanning a three-day period. These storms produced numerous instances of severe wind gusts, in addition to a tornado, a report of hail, and flash flooding.

A tornado developed near the summit of US-191 and Argyle Canyon |Road in remote southwestern Duchesne County at about 9200 feet. |Sporadic damage is noted in this area as it moved north over a |ridge line and into a valley adjacent to US-191 along Indian |Canyon.||The tornado then descended down the length of the valley from |about 9200 feet to a creek adjacent to US-191 at an elevation of |about 8500 feet. Over this period, both the strength and and width|of the tornado increased substantially with a continuous damage |path through a mixed aspen and conifer forest. The maximum damage |was found in this area and was significant. Almost all trees over |a large hillside facing the road were violently blown down, |snapped, or topped into a clearly convergent axis. Several tree |tops were desposited along the creek and road with no clear |indicatation as to where they orginated.||The tornado then crossed US-191 and ascended the hillside from |about 8500 feet to another ridge on the northwest side of the road|to an elevation of about 9100 feet. Considerable damage was noted|immediately north of US-191 where numerous trees were snapped or |uprooted, although not to the severe extent noted on the south |side of the road. Damage decreased considerably up the hillside to|the top of the 9100 foot ridge line with more sporadic toppled |trees.||A few toppled trees were noted into the next basin over the ridge|on the north side of the road, marking the last discernible |damage from the tornado, and the end of the 2 mile damage path.

From NOAA NCEI's Storm Events Database, the narrative the local forecast office wrote for Storm Data.

The warnings

No tornado warning for this county appears in the archive as in force at the moment the tornado touched down.

Every warning and watch covering the touchdown point that day, from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of National Weather Service products. Lead time is measured from the issue of the warning in force to the touchdown time in the database, both of which were recorded to the minute by different people.

The forecast that day

The Storm Prediction Center had this point in a General Thunderstorms Risk. The outlook in force was issued at 12:44 UTC.

SPC's Day 1 convective outlook as it stood when the tornado began, read at the touchdown point. The same archive is on the radar archive.

The air that afternoon

The radiosonde launches on either side of the tornado, from the nearest station that was launching then, drawn and analyzed the way Storm Lab does: the same diagram, the same parcel and shear definitions SPC's mesoanalysis uses.

Salt Lake City I, UT (KSLC), 12:00Z

3.2 hours before the tornado, 139 km from the path. June 19, 2022.

Skew-T log-pSkew-T log-p diagram, Salt Lake City I, UT at 12:00Z on 2022-06-19Temperature and dew point through the depth of the atmosphere, with the mixed-layer parcel lifted from the surface. Mixed-layer CAPE 0 joules per kilogram, CIN -95331, lifted condensation level 3747 meters above ground. Wind barbs in knots down the right edge.LCL10008507005003002001001 km2 km3 km6 km9 km12 km15 km-30°-20°-10°10°20°30°40°
Temperature in red, dew point in green, the mixed-layer parcel dashed. The warm shading is its CAPE, the cool shading the inhibition it has to break through.
HodographHodograph, Salt Lake City I, UT at 12:00Z on 2022-06-19The wind through the lowest 10 kilometers as a curve, rings every 10 meters per second labeled in knots. Zero to 1 km storm-relative helicity 66 square meters per square second, 0 to 6 km bulk shear 65 knots.1939587897117136Sfc1 km3 km6 km9 kmRMLM
The wind turning with height, colored by layer: ground to 1 km, 1 to 3 km, 3 to 6 km, 6 to 10 km. RM and LM are the right and left moving storms Bunkers' method gives; the shaded area is the 0 to 1 km storm-relative helicity.
Mixed-layer CAPE
0 J/kg
Mixed-layer CIN
-95331 J/kg
Surface CAPE
0 J/kg
Mixed-layer LCL
3747 m above ground
0-6 km bulk shear
65 kt
0-1 km bulk shear
19 kt
0-1 km storm-relative helicity
66 m²/s²
0-3 km storm-relative helicity
125 m²/s²
Significant tornado parameter
0.0
Supercell composite
0.0
0-3 km lapse rate
8.5 K/km

Open this sounding in Storm Lab

Salt Lake City I, UT (KSLC), 00:00Z

8.8 hours after it, 139 km from the path. June 20, 2022.

Skew-T log-pSkew-T log-p diagram, Salt Lake City I, UT at 00:00Z on 2022-06-20Temperature and dew point through the depth of the atmosphere, with the mixed-layer parcel lifted from the surface. Mixed-layer CAPE 3 joules per kilogram, CIN -140, lifted condensation level 2310 meters above ground. Wind barbs in knots down the right edge.LCLLFCEL10008507005003002001001 km2 km3 km6 km9 km12 km15 km-30°-20°-10°10°20°30°40°
Temperature in red, dew point in green, the mixed-layer parcel dashed. The warm shading is its CAPE, the cool shading the inhibition it has to break through.
HodographHodograph, Salt Lake City I, UT at 00:00Z on 2022-06-20The wind through the lowest 10 kilometers as a curve, rings every 10 meters per second labeled in knots. Zero to 1 km storm-relative helicity -50 square meters per square second, 0 to 6 km bulk shear 79 knots.1939587897Sfc1 km3 km6 km9 kmRMLM
The wind turning with height, colored by layer: ground to 1 km, 1 to 3 km, 3 to 6 km, 6 to 10 km. RM and LM are the right and left moving storms Bunkers' method gives; the shaded area is the 0 to 1 km storm-relative helicity.
Mixed-layer CAPE
3 J/kg
Mixed-layer CIN
-140 J/kg
Surface CAPE
246 J/kg
Mixed-layer LCL
2310 m above ground
0-6 km bulk shear
79 kt
0-1 km bulk shear
9 kt
0-1 km storm-relative helicity
-50 m²/s²
0-3 km storm-relative helicity
123 m²/s²
Significant tornado parameter
0.0
Supercell composite
-0.1
0-3 km lapse rate
9.3 K/km

Open this sounding in Storm Lab

What was reported nearby

Local storm reports within 60 km of the path, in the three hours either side.

Time (UTC)ReportWhereCountyRemark
13:10 UTCTSTM WND GST 6213 Nne Castle GateDuchesne, UTINDIAN CANYON SUMMIT
15:10 UTCHAIL 1HelperCarbon, UTPUBLIC REPORTS QUARTER SIZED HAIL WITH PHOTO VIA SOCIAL MEDIA.
15:10 UTCHAIL 1.25HelperCarbon, UTPUBLIC REPORTS HALF DOLLAR SIZED HAIL WITH REFERENCE PHOTO VIA SOCIAL MEDIA.
15:13 UTCTORNADO13 Ne Castle GateDuchesne, UTNWS STORM SURVEY CONFIRMED AN EF2 TORNADO DEVELOPED NEAR THE US-191 SUMMIT IN REMOTE SOUTHWESTERN DUCHESNE COUNTY EARLY ON SUNDAY MORNING 6/19. PEAK WINDS ARE ESTIMATED AT 125 MPH, WITH A PATH LENGTH JUST OVER 2 MILES, A
16:00 UTCFLASH FLOODSse HelperCarbon, UTRECEIVED VIDEO VIA SOCIAL MEDIA OF FLOODING OF THE PRICE RIVER IN HELPER. VIDEO SHOWED FLOWS AT OR ABOVE BANKFUL WITH LARGE DEBRIS CONTAINED IN THE FLOW. VIDEO RELAYED VIA MEDIA. DOWNSTREAM RIVER GAGE ALONG THE PRICE RIV

From the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of National Weather Service local storm reports.

This ground now

The live radar over the trackEvery 2022 tornado in UtahEvery tornado in Utah since 1950Warnings in force in Utah nowThe forecast where you are

What this means

Ratings are the survey's, read off the damage rather than measured; the rating scale is above. Tornado counts rise through the record as reporting improved, so a year in the 1950s is not comparable with one today except for the strongest tornadoes, which were always noticed.

Sources

NOAA Storm Prediction Center tornado database, 1950-2025, the official record kept by NOAA's Storm Prediction Center.