Tornadoes · United States · Nebraska · 2022
EF1 tornado, Bow Vly, Nebraska, May 30, 2022
This EF1 tornado ran 3.0 miles across Cedar County on May 30, 2022, touching down at 1:20 AM CDT and reaching 100 yards wide. It killed nobody.
The rating scale
Tracks are drawn in the color of the rating. The Enhanced Fujita scale rates the damage rather than measuring the wind: the speeds are what that damage is taken to imply.
EF065 to 85 mph
Light damage. Surface peeled off some roofs, gutters and siding damaged, branches broken, shallow-rooted trees pushed over.
EF186 to 110 mphthis tornado
Moderate damage. Roofs badly stripped, mobile homes overturned or badly damaged, exterior doors lost, windows broken.
EF2111 to 135 mph
Considerable damage. Roofs torn off well-built houses, frame homes shifted on their foundations, mobile homes destroyed, large trees snapped or uprooted, cars lifted off the ground.
EF3136 to 165 mph
Severe damage. Whole stories of well-built houses destroyed, large buildings badly damaged, trains overturned, trees debarked, heavy cars lifted and thrown.
EF4166 to 200 mph
Devastating damage. Well-built houses leveled, structures with weak foundations moved some distance, cars thrown and large missiles generated.
EF5over 200 mph
Incredible damage. Strong frame houses swept off their foundations, car-sized missiles thrown more than 100 meters, steel-reinforced concrete badly damaged, high-rise buildings deformed.
Unrated
The survey recorded a tornado but could not put a number on it, most often because it crossed open country and damaged nothing a rating can be read from.
The record
- Rating
- EF1
- Date
- May 30, 2022
- Touchdown
- 1:20 AM CDT (06:20 UTC)
- Lifted
- 1:23 AM CDT (06:23 UTC)
- On the ground
- 3 minutes
- Path length
- 3.0 miles (4.9 km)
- Path width
- 100 yards (91 m)
- Deaths
- 0
- Injuries
- 0
- County
- Cedar County
- Touchdown point
- 42.720, -97.280
- Lift-off point
- 42.750, -97.240
- Record number
- 2205300020-01
The damage survey
7 damage points were recorded along this path by NWS OAX, in the Damage Assessment Toolkit the survey teams carry. The strongest indicator was rated EF1. The highest wind the damage implies is 100 mph.
- Center pivot irrigation system with multiple segments overturned.
- Small trees torn out of ground. Fence filled with corn debris blown from the SW.
- Multiple segments of center pivot irrigation system flipped.
Survey points are preliminary and are the raw material the published rating was built from. Source: NWS Damage Assessment Toolkit.
What the Weather Service recorded
An enhanced risk for severe weather resulted in a few damaging wind gusts, 1 inch hail reports, and an EF-1 tornado.
A storm spotter observed the tornado develop just south of Highway 12 and then cross the highway toward the northeast. The tornado then damaged multiple center pivot irrigation systems, grain bins, and snapped several power poles in a pattern consistent with the tornado path. A tornado debris signature was also evident on radar after the tornado had dissipated.
From NOAA NCEI's Storm Events Database, the narrative the local forecast office wrote for Storm Data.
The warnings
18 minutes of warning. NWS OAX issued a tornado warning for this county at 06:02 UTC, 18 minutes before the tornado touched down, in force until 06:45 UTC.
The county was under a tornado watch, issued at 00:16 UTC and running to 07:55 UTC.
| Issued (UTC) | Expired | Product | Office |
|---|---|---|---|
| 00:16 UTC | 07:55 UTC | Tornado Watch | OAX |
| 04:30 UTC | 04:58 UTC | Severe Thunderstorm Warning | OAX |
| 05:30 UTC | 06:15 UTC | Tornado Warning | OAX |
| 06:02 UTC | 06:45 UTC | Tornado Warning | OAX |
| 06:18 UTC | 07:00 UTC | Severe Thunderstorm Warning | OAX |
| 16:21 UTC | 04:00 UTC | Wind Advisory | OAX |
| 16:49 UTC | 19:32 UTC | Tornado Watch | OAX |
Every warning and watch covering the touchdown point that day, from the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of National Weather Service products. Lead time is measured from the issue of the warning in force to the touchdown time in the database, both of which were recorded to the minute by different people.
The forecast that day
The Storm Prediction Center had this point in a Enhanced Risk, with a 0.10 chance of a tornado within 25 miles, in the hatched area where significant tornadoes were expected. The outlook in force was issued at 05:44 UTC.
SPC's Day 1 convective outlook as it stood when the tornado began, read at the touchdown point. The same archive is on the radar archive.
The air that afternoon
The radiosonde launches on either side of the tornado, from the nearest station that was launching then, drawn and analyzed the way Storm Lab does: the same diagram, the same parcel and shear definitions SPC's mesoanalysis uses.
Omaha, NE (KOAX), 00:00Z
6.3 hours before the tornado, 174 km from the path. May 30, 2022.
- Mixed-layer CAPE
- 2423 J/kg
- Mixed-layer CIN
- -90 J/kg
- Surface CAPE
- 3412 J/kg
- Mixed-layer LCL
- 1668 m above ground
- 0-6 km bulk shear
- 54 kt
- 0-1 km bulk shear
- 25 kt
- 0-1 km storm-relative helicity
- 233 m²/s²
- 0-3 km storm-relative helicity
- 283 m²/s²
- Significant tornado parameter
- 1.0
- Supercell composite
- 19.2
- 0-3 km lapse rate
- 6.8 K/km
Omaha, NE (KOAX), 12:00Z
5.7 hours after it, 174 km from the path. May 30, 2022.
- Mixed-layer CAPE
- 1569 J/kg
- Mixed-layer CIN
- -154 J/kg
- Surface CAPE
- 2052 J/kg
- Mixed-layer LCL
- 897 m above ground
- 0-6 km bulk shear
- 61 kt
- 0-1 km bulk shear
- 30 kt
- 0-1 km storm-relative helicity
- 211 m²/s²
- 0-3 km storm-relative helicity
- 433 m²/s²
- Significant tornado parameter
- 0.7
- Supercell composite
- 3.2
- 0-3 km lapse rate
- 5.9 K/km
The radar
The Sioux Falls radar (KFSD), 104 km away, was scanning. The volume nearest the touchdown began at 06:21 UTC.
Open the radar archive at this moment, over the track
Reflectivity and velocity, decoded from the Level II archive in the browser. Volumes take a few seconds to open the first time.
What was reported nearby
Local storm reports within 60 km of the path, in the three hours either side.
| Time (UTC) | Report | Where | County | Remark |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05:24 UTC | HAIL 0.5 | 4 Ene Wynot | Cedar, NE | REPORT FROM MPING: HALF-INCH (0.50 IN.). |
| 05:42 UTC | HAIL 1.75 | 10 Se Santee | Knox, NE | GOLF BALL TO 2 INCH HAIL STONES. TIME ESTIMATED BASED ON RADAR. |
| 06:00 UTC | FUNNEL CLOUD | 1 Sw Crofton | Knox, NE | HAM RADIO OPERATOR RELAYED REPORT OF A FEW FUNNEL CLOUDS DESCENDING AND GOING BACK UP AS IT KEEPS MOVING FORWARD. |
| 06:19 UTC | TSTM WND DMG | 1 Wnw Hartington | Cedar, NE | TREE DAMAGE ON THE GOLF COURSE. TIME ESTIMATED BASED ON RADAR DATA. |
| 06:20 UTC | HAIL 1.5 | 4 W Wynot | Cedar, NE | CORRECTS PREVIOUS HAIL REPORT FROM 4 W WYNOT. DELAYED REPORT. POWER LINES DOWN. DISCOVERED BY DEPUTY AFTER STORMS PASSED AND RELAYED TO EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT. TIME ESTIMATED FROM RADAR. |
| 06:20 UTC | TORNADO | 5 Ene Fordyce | Cedar, NE | A STORM SPOTTER OBSERVED THE TORNADO DEVELOP JUST SOUTH OF HIGHWAY 12 AND THEN CROSS THE HIGHWAY TOWARD THE NORTHEAST. THE TORNADO THEN DAMAGED MULTIPLE CENTER PIVOT IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, GRAIN BINS, AND SNAPPED SEVERAL PO |
| 06:25 UTC | TSTM WND DMG | Wynot | Cedar, NE | LARGE TREE DOWN NEAR WYNOT. |
From the Iowa Environmental Mesonet's archive of National Weather Service local storm reports.
This ground now
The live radar over the trackEvery 2022 tornado in NebraskaEvery tornado in Nebraska since 1950Warnings in force in Nebraska nowThe forecast where you are
The other tornadoes of May 30, 2022
36 more were confirmed in the United States that day.
| Date | Time | Rating | Where | Path (mi) | Width (yd) | Deaths | Injuries | Damage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30 | 1:51 AM CDT | EF1 | Minnehaha, SD | 0.5 | 50 | |||
| May 30 | 2:05 AM CDT | EF1 | Minnehaha, SD | 0.5 | 50 | |||
| May 30 | 2:17 AM CDT | EF1 | Lyon, IA | 1.9 | 100 | |||
| May 30 | 2:21 AM CDT | EF0 | Lyon, IA | 0.5 | 60 | |||
| May 30 | 2:33 AM CDT | EF0 | Nobles, MN | 0.9 | 50 | |||
| May 30 | 12:29 PM CDT | Unrated | Bon Homme, SD | 5.5 | 50 | |||
| May 30 | 1:55 PM CDT | Unrated | McCook, SD | 0.8 | 25 | |||
| May 30 | 2:15 PM CDT | Unrated | Brookings, SD | 1.7 | 50 | |||
| May 30 | 2:23 PM CDT | EF1 | Brookings, SD | 0.8 | 50 | |||
| May 30 | 2:30 PM CDT | EF0 | Hamlin, SD | 0.7 | 10 | |||
| May 30 | 2:41 PM CDT | EF2 | Deuel, SD | 12.4 | 150 | |||
| May 30 | 2:46 PM CDT | EF3 | Deuel, SD | 13.3 | 100 | |||
| May 30 | 2:50 PM CDT | EF1 | Deuel, SD | 0.4 | 20 | |||
| May 30 | 3:05 PM CDT | EF1 | Grant, SD | 10.7 | 40 | |||
| May 30 | 3:10 PM CDT | EF1 | Grant, SD | 4.5 | 20 | |||
| May 30 | 3:15 PM CDT | Unrated | Rock, MN | 0.7 | 20 | |||
| May 30 | 3:25 PM CDT | Unrated | Pipestone, MN | 0.4 | 20 | |||
| May 30 | 3:36 PM CDT | EF1 | Big Stone, MN | 2.4 | 30 | |||
| May 30 | 3:39 PM CDT | EF1 | Swift, MN | 1.8 | 100 | |||
| May 30 | 3:40 PM CDT | EF1 | Swift, MN | 18.3 | 350 | |||
| May 30 | 3:49 PM CDT | EF1 | Swift, MN | 7.2 | 100 | |||
| May 30 | 4:04 PM CDT | EF1 | Pope, MN | 5.4 | 100 | |||
| May 30 | 4:13 PM CDT | EF1 | Pope, MN | 3.2 | 200 | |||
| May 30 | 4:14 PM CDT | EF2 | Grant, MN | 6.8 | 350 | $2.0 million | ||
| May 30 | 4:15 PM CDT | EF2 | Grant, MN | 11.0 | 400 | $1.0 million | ||
| May 30 | 4:27 PM CDT | EF2 | Pope, MN | 19.6 | 800 | |||
| May 30 | 4:34 PM CDT | EF1 | Otter Tail, MN | 4.5 | 200 | $50,000 | ||
| May 30 | 4:58 PM CDT | EF1 | Otter Tail, MN | 5.4 | 300 | $150,000 | ||
| May 30 | 5:00 PM CDT | EF1 | Todd, MN | 15.0 | 800 | |||
| May 30 | 5:20 PM CDT | EF2 | Wadena, MN | 10.5 | 450 | $1.1 million | ||
| May 30 | 5:27 PM CDT | EF1 | Wadena, MN | 2.5 | 150 | $50,000 | ||
| May 30 | 5:37 PM CDT | EF1 | Cass, MN | 4.3 | 500 | |||
| May 30 | 6:12 PM CDT | EF1 | McLeod, MN | 18.5 | 400 | |||
| May 30 | 6:44 PM CDT | EF0 | Itasca, MN | 1.0 | 40 | |||
| May 30 | 6:46 PM CDT | EF1 | Itasca, MN | 2.5 | 150 | |||
| May 30 | 7:50 PM CDT | EF1 | Pine, MN | 3.3 | 300 |
What this means
Ratings are the survey's, read off the damage rather than measured; the rating scale is above. Tornado counts rise through the record as reporting improved, so a year in the 1950s is not comparable with one today except for the strongest tornadoes, which were always noticed.
Sources
NOAA Storm Prediction Center tornado database, 1950-2025, the official record kept by NOAA's Storm Prediction Center.